Demonetization – A Class Divide?

Demonetization – A Class Divide?

Despite being a tool for fighting corruption, demonetization has polarized us as a society. How do we, as a society, think on a matter of vital national interest? Please see the opinion of the common man at the end of this blog. What should be done to make this a national initiative? Please read http://wp.me/p7XEWW-km

Background

The current demonetization drive for stopping corruption has either become a boon or a bane. Demonetization of currency has strongly opinionated Indian. At the core of our values, we all want corruption to be eradicated. We all differ in our perspective towards how this should be executed. Eradicating corruption is a fundamental initiative that has significant impact to our identity, polity and to the country’s Macroeconomy. Across sections of the society, many are doubtful and cynical. What makes us feel so? Why do we see a class divide and a strong polarization of opinion? What can be done to reduce this gap and drive this initiative as a national cause?

Is this stop gap? Or will it really stop?

Nefarious means are unlikely to change unless we see a substantial change in attitude towards way of living and transacting in our daily life. Whenever radical change is initiated, and if it is unaccompanied by fundamental change, the system is bound to go back to status quo. I already see those signs. So demonetisation will either stall or impede the flow of black money, temporarily but it won’t nix this at the bud.

Who likes or dislikes demonetization?

Service class and Expatriates for sure are supportive of this initiative. Their earnings are all white transactions. Business, Politician, Illegal (drugs, alcohol, nefarious political-business connections and terrorist), those using hawala, are unlikely to accept or adopt this change. Farming community will be neutral. Poor will be swayed by the noise rather than the voices they hear.

What an irony, we haven’t learnt for centuries

Earlier, the Englishman arrived in sixteenth century. They stayed, understood, conquered, consolidated, ruled and looted and deprived this golden land not just materially but made us defunct morally.

We still haven’t changed. We still think our cause above the country, prefer to be blind sighted to others perspective. Seems like, that is within our genome and our destiny or else, why can’t we listen to each other’s perspective, why should we not have a national inclusive dialog?

No, that inclusive dialog won’t happen because somewhere, we deeply trust that ‘My truth is superior than your truth’ and we go a step further, to engross all the credit for this achievement. Collectively, we have forgotten what is best for this country.

We know corruption is a national menace, it’s like an enemy within.  In the best interest of the nation, we should be unified for this national cause, we should come forward and adopt and accept, and provide constructive recommendations, rise above ourselves to let this happen. To some, this may sound hollow, but nations like Japan and several from European Union, have risen because, their constituent decided to adopt that pathway. It is not a utopian principle, it’s realty with pragmatism.

Should Prime Minister Modi be inclusive?

Yes, if this needs to succeed! Do we need to do more than withdrawing old currency and circulating new notes? Do we need this to be backed up with change in our attitude and fundamental way we think and work in our daily life?

Why Presidents Fail And How They Can Succeed Again

Kamarck, a Sr. Fellow at Brookings Institute Governance Studies, argues that presidents spend too little time investing on Governing. She explains the difficulties of governing in our modern political landscape, and offers examples and recommendations of how our next president can not only recreate faith in leadership but also run a competent, successful administration.’ I believe, we can easily extrapolate this to include our administrators as well.

A Kind request

This is a non-partisan exercise, not supported or aligned with any political group. Neither is this supported by any business or vested interest. To many, it is a matter of national importance and I would appreciate your motivation in spreading this message. By spreading this message, you may get to know the perspective of those within your community.

Please share your opinion when you visit the survey on the link below. As always, polls are anonymous. I have enabled single voting per device. If you have a question, kindly use the comment box to submit.

Note: I have disabled advertisements from this site. Despite if you see any advertisements, kindly report to me with a screenshot or time stamp the event. 


Additional Reading

  1. Demonetization and India’s Macroeconomy – Will Rupee Depreciate? Copy paste this link if the above won’t work http://wp.me/p7XEWW-jt
  2. Surgical Demonetization? What Is Good And What Needs To Be Fixed? Copy paste this link if the above won’t work http://wp.me/p7XEWW-eA
  3. Why Presidents Fail And How They Can Succeed Again

Uniform Civil Code

Religion is a personal and private affair, you have right to practice your religion but within the confines of your defined space (home, place of worship or confined gathering). Societal life (presuming multicultural plural society) should be defined by legal statutory framework. We should not encroach onto the personal space meant for others. Why? It would mean imposing our values and ideals upon them.

Debate on common civil code across nation….my response to this topic..may be lop sided, Nitin Aslam and other rational minds, kindly correct or add.

Here is my simple view – religion is a personal and private affair, you have right to practice your religion but within the confines of your defined space (home, place of worship or confined gathering). Societal life (presuming multicultural plural society) should be defined by legal statutory framework. Yes, we will see overlapping and conflicting gray areas. To address these conflicts, we should not encroach onto the personal space meant for others. Why? It would mean imposing our values and ideals upon them. Should majority view be imposed upon a minority group? Naturally, it happens, conscientiously, we should avoid.
Example – In India, it is a common practice to spank kids (or at least it was), those standards are equated with child abuse in western world. Initially, when Asians were discovered with those so called brutal (western perspective), they took away kids from such households (check for coining and abuse). Now, it is accepted practice to understand such behavior as normal love affection care spectrum.
It has become a norm here to understand cultural sensitivity and respond accordingly. What’s nice about US is not that they don’t err but they change and build nation with inclusivity.